Timeline for I feel unqualified for my job - what is the right thing to do?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 12, 2019 at 22:10 | comment | added | jpmc26 | @Brandin "Diversity hiring" means categorizing people into "advantaged" and "disadvantaged" groups and then specifically seeking to hire people from the "disadvantaged" category. Someone who is biologically male but has a female name might have been assumed to be transgender, and transgenders are considered a "disadvantaged" group. | |
Apr 17, 2016 at 4:12 | comment | added | Emmet | FWIW, I'd much rather have an “under-confident” employee or colleague who worries that s/he doesn't know enough than an over-confident employee or colleague who thinks s/he knows everything. | |
Apr 15, 2016 at 2:42 | comment | added | TOOGAM | @Brandin because after HR tries to achieve it's goal, the interview may involve people who have more skill-oriented goals (and the interview might not even include anyone from HR). Well, that's a theory, anyway. The approach would likely not work with some organizations. That doesn't mean that the method can't work with any organization. | |
Feb 27, 2016 at 0:37 | comment | added | mhwombat | "I decided to learn the things I didn't know and get to that point where I felt like I was right for the position, as fast as I could. I was definitely a lot more qualified for the work at the end of my internship than at the start" - Sounds like a model employee! That company was lucky to have such a motivated, hard-working intern. | |
Feb 26, 2016 at 11:54 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 26, 2016 at 18:26 | |||||
Feb 26, 2016 at 5:28 | history | edited | SplitInfinity | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed identifying information
|
Aug 22, 2014 at 6:32 | comment | added | Brandin |
While I am a male, my name is considered a girl's name in North America. Due to the diversity hiring efforts in the software industry, I have no problem believing that's what got me an interview. Just have to comment this doesn't make sense to me. Suppose company is trying to fill a gender quota (conceivably) they could ring you up because you got a female-sounding name and they want more women. But when you show up to the interview and see you seem to be more masculine than expected why would they give you the job then if theyre trying to do that??
|
|
Aug 21, 2014 at 22:14 | answer | added | TheSoundDefense | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 21, 2014 at 21:22 | answer | added | simbo | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 9, 2014 at 14:36 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWorkplace/status/486881617718562817 | ||
Jun 29, 2014 at 17:32 | comment | added | jmort253 | comments removed: Please don't use comments to answer questions as this may prevent others from providing full, complete answers that the community would vote on. Please see How should I post a useful non-answer if it shouldn't be a comment? for more guidance. | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 18:08 | answer | added | O. Jones | timeline score: 27 | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 17:31 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 7, 2014 at 3:04 | |||||
Jun 28, 2014 at 17:24 | answer | added | Vietnhi Phuvan | timeline score: 5 | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 17:11 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 28, 2014 at 19:16 | |||||
Jun 28, 2014 at 17:09 | answer | added | apaul | timeline score: 11 | |
Jun 28, 2014 at 16:48 | history | asked | SplitInfinity | CC BY-SA 3.0 |