Timeline for How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
56 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 14 at 16:48 | comment | added | Questor | Out of curiosity.. Is your company still in business? I know a handful of companies that screwed their P.Engs... and then went out of business because P.Eng are in fact very hard to replace. | |
Aug 11, 2021 at 1:07 | comment | added | CoffeeTableEspresso | A lot of the comments and answers assume he's being malicious here, but honestly, if I were working for a promotion I'd be working extra, and if I then got passed up for someone's nephew, I'd probably stop putting in as much effort too.... | |
Apr 11, 2021 at 12:46 | comment | added | Barry DeCicco | @NotVonKaiser: "I would nevertheless be very wary about keeping a person who behaves like this on the payroll. First and foremost, this is a tactic that he did not have to use but did, and going forward, you have to take into account the idea that he will pull something like this again the next time he feels wronged about something." One of his options would have been to say nothing until he had a new job lined up, then put in his resignation. From the original post, he is not quickly or easily replaceable, so the company would have taken a blow - even if management decided to get competent ab | |
Aug 23, 2020 at 13:50 | comment | added | Gwyn Evans | I wonder what happened, given this was 4 years ago... | |
Aug 22, 2020 at 11:37 | comment | added | Michael Durrant | When you state his 'action' is a 'game' it shows you don't understand his point of view fully. It is not a game to him. It is his life. He may not act the best way but you should and should respect him regardless. | |
Jul 5, 2020 at 14:06 | comment | added | ASDFQWERTY | It may be useful to know what feedback he was given related to his denial of promotion. Was it anything like "we want you to have more exacting standards when signing off on tests," or "you need to prioritize client requirements over internal admin" such as signing off on junior engineer work records? If so, he's not "playing" or "wasting time out of spite." Be careful not to assume too much. | |
Mar 7, 2020 at 11:01 | comment | added | Mike Wise | First reading through I missed the part about a relation of the exec board getting the promotion, it is buried in the middle of the text, but it is a major part of the problem. It deserves to be highlighted, in this post, as well as in real life. | |
Nov 19, 2018 at 21:12 | answer | added | Ertai87 | timeline score: 10 | |
Nov 19, 2018 at 19:37 | history | reopened |
Old_Lamplighter Joe Strazzere DarkCygnus♦ SaggingRufus IDrinkandIKnowThings |
||
Nov 19, 2018 at 17:10 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 19, 2018 at 19:40 | |||||
Aug 23, 2018 at 13:25 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Aug 27, 2018 at 12:46 | |||||
Apr 23, 2018 at 14:43 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Apr 25, 2018 at 21:33 | |||||
Jun 20, 2017 at 16:46 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Jun 21, 2017 at 17:28 | |||||
May 17, 2017 at 15:00 | review | Reopen votes | |||
May 18, 2017 at 2:33 | |||||
Apr 17, 2017 at 14:58 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Apr 18, 2017 at 1:56 | |||||
Feb 19, 2017 at 3:02 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Feb 20, 2017 at 11:46 | |||||
Feb 14, 2017 at 3:08 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Feb 14, 2017 at 15:28 | |||||
Feb 2, 2017 at 19:12 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Feb 3, 2017 at 21:58 | |||||
Nov 24, 2016 at 9:58 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 26, 2016 at 0:14 | |||||
Oct 28, 2016 at 8:22 | comment | added | Nobody | I notice that the troublesome professional engineer is responsible for evaluating security and safety features of the products. Yet, people paid attention to the salary and office politics in the question. I would like to call attention to the users of this site about why this question is vital to the workplace by reminding everyone the recent event - Samsung Note 7. If Samsung had paid more attention to the safety of their products, they would not lose billions of dollars. | |
Oct 28, 2016 at 7:17 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Oct 29, 2016 at 11:25 | |||||
Jun 22, 2016 at 14:37 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Jun 23, 2016 at 14:32 | |||||
Mar 10, 2016 at 22:50 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Mar 11, 2016 at 21:33 | |||||
Mar 10, 2016 at 22:47 | history | closed |
Jim G. paparazzo gnat mxyzplk user8365 |
Not suitable for this site | |
Mar 10, 2016 at 18:42 | comment | added | longneck | Are you his direct supervisor? | |
Mar 10, 2016 at 0:13 | history | edited | enderland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
Mar 9, 2016 at 23:16 | history | edited | enderland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 125 characters in body
|
Mar 9, 2016 at 18:06 | answer | added | Peter | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 9, 2016 at 12:46 | history | protected | Jane S | ||
Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 | answer | added | J... | timeline score: 88 | |
Mar 9, 2016 at 11:15 | answer | added | Oliver Jones | timeline score: 15 | |
Mar 9, 2016 at 2:23 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 9, 2016 at 15:12 | |||||
Mar 9, 2016 at 0:58 | answer | added | MealyPotatoes | timeline score: 21 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 23:06 | history | edited | user47645 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1198 characters in body
|
Mar 8, 2016 at 19:37 | history | edited | user47645 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1078 characters in body
|
Mar 8, 2016 at 18:38 | answer | added | NotVonKaiser | timeline score: 10 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 18:06 | answer | added | Agent_L | timeline score: 184 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 17:45 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 8, 2016 at 23:35 | |||||
Mar 8, 2016 at 15:30 | answer | added | Old_Lamplighter | timeline score: 399 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 14:32 | answer | added | Lii | timeline score: 34 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 13:01 | answer | added | deworde | timeline score: 52 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 9:17 | comment | added | Radu Murzea | Have you tried a one-on-one session with him in which you tried to address these issues ? Maybe this way you'll get more insight into his reasoning about why he does this. | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 4:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/707064403464683520 | ||
S Mar 8, 2016 at 4:33 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
S Mar 8, 2016 at 4:33 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13 | history | edited | Aaron Hall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adjust title (PE is an official legal title); fix typo in body
|
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13 | history | suggested | nobody | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adjust title (PE is an official legal title); fix typo in body
|
Mar 8, 2016 at 2:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13 | |||||
Mar 8, 2016 at 1:57 | answer | added | Pat | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 8, 2016 at 1:40 | answer | added | Cloud | timeline score: 182 | |
Mar 7, 2016 at 23:03 | answer | added | Kilisi | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:53 | answer | added | Wesley Long | timeline score: 341 | |
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:50 | answer | added | Bill Leeper | timeline score: 8 | |
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:40 | history | edited | user47645 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 380 characters in body
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:29 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 8, 2016 at 0:12 | |||||
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:24 | history | asked | user47645 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |