Skip to main content
56 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 14 at 16:48 comment added Questor Out of curiosity.. Is your company still in business? I know a handful of companies that screwed their P.Engs... and then went out of business because P.Eng are in fact very hard to replace.
Aug 11, 2021 at 1:07 comment added CoffeeTableEspresso A lot of the comments and answers assume he's being malicious here, but honestly, if I were working for a promotion I'd be working extra, and if I then got passed up for someone's nephew, I'd probably stop putting in as much effort too....
Apr 11, 2021 at 12:46 comment added Barry DeCicco @NotVonKaiser: "I would nevertheless be very wary about keeping a person who behaves like this on the payroll. First and foremost, this is a tactic that he did not have to use but did, and going forward, you have to take into account the idea that he will pull something like this again the next time he feels wronged about something." One of his options would have been to say nothing until he had a new job lined up, then put in his resignation. From the original post, he is not quickly or easily replaceable, so the company would have taken a blow - even if management decided to get competent ab
Aug 23, 2020 at 13:50 comment added Gwyn Evans I wonder what happened, given this was 4 years ago...
Aug 22, 2020 at 11:37 comment added Michael Durrant When you state his 'action' is a 'game' it shows you don't understand his point of view fully. It is not a game to him. It is his life. He may not act the best way but you should and should respect him regardless.
Jul 5, 2020 at 14:06 comment added ASDFQWERTY It may be useful to know what feedback he was given related to his denial of promotion. Was it anything like "we want you to have more exacting standards when signing off on tests," or "you need to prioritize client requirements over internal admin" such as signing off on junior engineer work records? If so, he's not "playing" or "wasting time out of spite." Be careful not to assume too much.
Mar 7, 2020 at 11:01 comment added Mike Wise First reading through I missed the part about a relation of the exec board getting the promotion, it is buried in the middle of the text, but it is a major part of the problem. It deserves to be highlighted, in this post, as well as in real life.
Nov 19, 2018 at 21:12 answer added Ertai87 timeline score: 10
Nov 19, 2018 at 19:37 history reopened Old_Lamplighter
Joe Strazzere
DarkCygnus
SaggingRufus
IDrinkandIKnowThings
Nov 19, 2018 at 17:10 review Reopen votes
Nov 19, 2018 at 19:40
Aug 23, 2018 at 13:25 review Reopen votes
Aug 27, 2018 at 12:46
Apr 23, 2018 at 14:43 review Reopen votes
Apr 25, 2018 at 21:33
Jun 20, 2017 at 16:46 review Reopen votes
Jun 21, 2017 at 17:28
May 17, 2017 at 15:00 review Reopen votes
May 18, 2017 at 2:33
Apr 17, 2017 at 14:58 review Reopen votes
Apr 18, 2017 at 1:56
Feb 19, 2017 at 3:02 review Reopen votes
Feb 20, 2017 at 11:46
Feb 14, 2017 at 3:08 review Reopen votes
Feb 14, 2017 at 15:28
Feb 2, 2017 at 19:12 review Reopen votes
Feb 3, 2017 at 21:58
Nov 24, 2016 at 9:58 review Reopen votes
Nov 26, 2016 at 0:14
Oct 28, 2016 at 8:22 comment added Nobody I notice that the troublesome professional engineer is responsible for evaluating security and safety features of the products. Yet, people paid attention to the salary and office politics in the question. I would like to call attention to the users of this site about why this question is vital to the workplace by reminding everyone the recent event - Samsung Note 7. If Samsung had paid more attention to the safety of their products, they would not lose billions of dollars.
Oct 28, 2016 at 7:17 review Reopen votes
Oct 29, 2016 at 11:25
Jun 22, 2016 at 14:37 review Reopen votes
Jun 23, 2016 at 14:32
Mar 10, 2016 at 22:50 review Reopen votes
Mar 11, 2016 at 21:33
Mar 10, 2016 at 22:47 history closed Jim G.
paparazzo
gnat
mxyzplk
user8365
Not suitable for this site
Mar 10, 2016 at 18:42 comment added longneck Are you his direct supervisor?
Mar 10, 2016 at 0:13 history edited enderland CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Mar 9, 2016 at 23:16 history edited enderland CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 125 characters in body
Mar 9, 2016 at 18:06 answer added Peter timeline score: 2
Mar 9, 2016 at 12:46 history protected Jane S
Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 answer added J... timeline score: 88
Mar 9, 2016 at 11:15 answer added Oliver Jones timeline score: 15
Mar 9, 2016 at 2:23 review Close votes
Mar 9, 2016 at 15:12
Mar 9, 2016 at 0:58 answer added MealyPotatoes timeline score: 21
Mar 8, 2016 at 23:06 history edited user47645 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1198 characters in body
Mar 8, 2016 at 19:37 history edited user47645 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1078 characters in body
Mar 8, 2016 at 18:38 answer added NotVonKaiser timeline score: 10
Mar 8, 2016 at 18:06 answer added Agent_L timeline score: 184
Mar 8, 2016 at 17:45 vote accept CommunityBot
Mar 8, 2016 at 23:35
Mar 8, 2016 at 15:30 answer added Old_Lamplighter timeline score: 399
Mar 8, 2016 at 14:32 answer added Lii timeline score: 34
Mar 8, 2016 at 13:01 answer added deworde timeline score: 52
Mar 8, 2016 at 9:17 comment added Radu Murzea Have you tried a one-on-one session with him in which you tried to address these issues ? Maybe this way you'll get more insight into his reasoning about why he does this.
Mar 8, 2016 at 4:44 history tweeted twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/707064403464683520
S Mar 8, 2016 at 4:33 history mod moved comments to chat
S Mar 8, 2016 at 4:33 comment added Monica Cellio Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13 history edited Aaron Hall CC BY-SA 3.0
Adjust title (PE is an official legal title); fix typo in body
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13 history suggested nobody CC BY-SA 3.0
Adjust title (PE is an official legal title); fix typo in body
Mar 8, 2016 at 2:52 review Suggested edits
S Mar 8, 2016 at 3:13
Mar 8, 2016 at 1:57 answer added Pat timeline score: 6
Mar 8, 2016 at 1:40 answer added Cloud timeline score: 182
Mar 7, 2016 at 23:03 answer added Kilisi timeline score: 3
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:53 answer added Wesley Long timeline score: 341
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:50 answer added Bill Leeper timeline score: 8
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:40 history edited user47645 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 380 characters in body
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:29 review First posts
Mar 8, 2016 at 0:12
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:24 history asked user47645 CC BY-SA 3.0