Timeline for How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 20:00 | comment | added | aaron | This. There isn't a scenario where he goes out the door both painlessly and cheaply. They may as well spend the money and save the pain (and probably a good deal of money, to boot). He definitely needs to be out the door when this is over though: I don't think you can ever really trust him anymore, given that he knows your company is willing to screw him. | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 18:35 | comment | added | Oliver Jones | Very true: Whatever your angle, something smells pretty bad at that firm - and you'd have to be an imbecile not to detect the stench. Therein lies the problem: Surprisingly few engineers are imbeciles, even if they are treated by HR and management as if they were. (This particular class of cognitive dissonance has never ceased to amaze me.) | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 16:04 | comment | added | John R. Strohm | At this point, the odds are better than even that the soon-to-be-former EITs will bail the moment they get their Registered Professional Engineer licenses, just as their predecessors have. (Re-read the original, where it says that the unwritten part of the job was to sign off on EIT timesheets, to get them their PE licenses. Apparently, he HAD been signing off on them in the past, and those EITs HAD been getting their licenses, but, "somehow", this guy is now their ONLY in-house PE. Connect the dots and run the numbers...) | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 13:26 | history | edited | Oliver Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 880 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 11:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 15:12 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 11:15 | history | answered | Oliver Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |