Timeline for How do you handle a task that is not really meant for your position?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2016 at 0:02 | vote | accept | Saudate | ||
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:35 | history | edited | user7019377 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 273 characters in body; edited body
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:29 | comment | added | user7019377 | The explanation is that the negotiation style of his boss might be OK when he deals with employees who perform grunt work but is inadequate if he has the degree of autonomy and responsibility that comes with his new projects. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:28 | comment | added | Old_Lamplighter | @user7019377 tone matters a lot in here. One user had his post go from -5 to 22 after a simple edit for tone. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:26 | comment | added | IDrinkandIKnowThings | I would have had the same issue if the statement were at the end of the answer or stuck in the middle. making definitive claims like that needs to be supported and well explained. Just softening it up to "this could be an explotive situation" would have helped, but it would still need to be explained. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:18 | comment | added | user7019377 | I changed the wording of the first sentence | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:17 | history | edited | user7019377 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:07 | comment | added | user7019377 | Please also read more than the first words because I specifically go on to say how he can find a positive opportunity here | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:07 | comment | added | user7019377 | I did not mean to assume malice, I mean to say that the working conditions are exploitative as of now. | |
| Nov 14, 2016 at 21:06 | history | edited | user7019377 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2016 at 20:52 | history | answered | user7019377 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |