I gave two weeks notice last Friday to have my last day be July 29th. I had previously scheduled an appointment with a doctor in another city on that Friday. Policy dictates using sick days for appointments is allowed.
I also set up two appointments on Thursday before that to try and take care of some things before beginning my new job (dentist, Lasik consultation).
When HR reached out to schedule an exit interview on Friday I explained the situation and asked to do the interview on Wednesday.
They followed up by asking "so your official last day should be Wednesday then?"
I believe if I say yes they will not pay me for those two days. Am I being greedy in wanting to be paid for those days?
I had over 90 hours of paid sick time accrued when I gave my notice. Even if I called in sick daily I couldn't use it all, and it is not paid out when I leave. (Separate pto category is)
I'm fairly confident I'm technically "in the right" to take them as sick days and be paid for them - but is it worth it from a "people perspective"?
Additional context from comments:
Q: What do you mean by a people perspective? Burning bridges?
A: Yeah, burning bridges, seeming greedy, putting myself before the other people at the company. I had more than my fair share of problems at certain times with this company, but overall I appreciate the owners, most upper management, everyone I've worked with in HR, etc. etc. I don't think asking for the 16 hours is that big of a deal, but I obviously have a biased perspective. I also have a lot of sick time accrued because they were flexible over the years in letting me work remotely when I otherwise would have had to use sick time.